Winstanley v Winstanley [2001] EWCA Civ 460 (23 March 2001)

Winstanley v Winstanley [2001] EWCA Civ 460 (23 March 2001)

The existence of a genuine triable issue on the son's cross-claim for damages, established by prior judgment and ongoing proceedings, required the statutory demand to be set aside and the bankruptcy order to be discharged. The exceptional circumstances of the family dispute and the disproportionate consequences of bankruptcy further justified this outcome.

Citation
[2001] EWCA Civ 460
Parties
Petitioner/respondent: Ralph Winstanley; Respondent/appellant: David Richard Winstanley
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 March 2001
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court (chancery Division, Bankruptcy)
Outcome
Appeal allowed; statutory demand and bankruptcy order set aside; bankruptcy petition dismissed.
Legal Topics
Statutory Demand, Bankruptcy Petition, Cross Claim, Assessment of Damages, Abuse of Process, Family Dispute, Agricultural Tenancy
Bankruptcy Landlord and Tenant Civil Procedure Statutory Demand Bankruptcy Petition Cross Claim Assessment of Damages Abuse of Process +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ralph Winstanley

Petitioner/respondent

David Richard Winstanley

Respondent/appellant

Procedural Posture

Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court (chancery Division, Bankruptcy)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the bankruptcy order against the son should be set aside due to a genuine triable cross-claim for damages against the father
  2. 2 Whether the statutory demand was an abuse of process in light of ongoing proceedings regarding damages for unlawful occupation of property

Ratio Decidendi

The existence of a genuine triable issue on the son's cross-claim for damages, established by prior judgment and ongoing proceedings, required the statutory demand to be set aside and the bankruptcy order to be discharged. The exceptional circumstances of the family dispute and the disproportionate consequences of bankruptcy further justified this outcome.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; statutory demand and bankruptcy order set aside; bankruptcy petition dismissed.

Orders

  • Order of 15th August 2000 set aside
  • Order of 11th July 2000 set aside