Ruttle Plant Hire Ltd v Secretary of State for Environment Food & Rural Affairs
Incorrect invoices do not preclude the application of the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998; statutory interest runs from 30 days after the purchaser receives notice of the amount claimed, subject to remission only if the supplier's conduct justifies it. The Judge erred in remitting or reducing interest without sufficient justification based on the supplier's conduct. The 1981 Act would apply from completion of the work if the 1998 Act did not, but the 1998 Act governs here.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Ruttle Plant Hire Limited; Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for Environment Food & Rural Affairs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (technology & Construction Court) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Interest, Late Payment of Debts, Discretion to Remit Interest, Interpretation of Invoices, Implied Terms in Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ruttle Plant Hire Limited
Claimant/appellant
Secretary of State for Environment Food & Rural Affairs
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (technology & Construction Court) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether incorrect invoices preclude application of the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998
- 2 Whether statutory interest should be remitted due to supplier's conduct
- 3 Whether the 1981 Act applies if the 1998 Act does not
Ratio Decidendi
Incorrect invoices do not preclude the application of the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998; statutory interest runs from 30 days after the purchaser receives notice of the amount claimed, subject to remission only if the supplier's conduct justifies it. The Judge erred in remitting or reducing interest without sufficient justification based on the supplier's conduct. The 1981 Act would apply from completion of the work if the 1998 Act did not, but the 1998 Act governs here.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Statutory interest under the 1998 Act to run from 30 days after receipt of each relevant invoice, at the statutory rate (8% above base rate), except for underclaims and unbilled sums where interest runs from when first claimed.
- No remission or reduction of statutory interest based on supplier's conduct in this case.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment