Wolman v Islington London Borough Council [2006] EWCA Civ 1060 (11 July 2006)

Permission to appeal is granted because the applicant's argument regarding the interpretation of 'on' in the statute has real prospects of success and raises an issue of importance.

Citation: [2006] EWCA Civ 1060
Parties: Claimant/appellant: Wolman; Defendant/respondent: Islington London Borough Council
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 11 July 2006
Procedural Posture: Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Outcome: Permission to appeal granted
Legal Topics: Statutory Interpretation, Parking Offences, Urban Road Regulation

Administrative Law Local Government Law Criminal Law Statutory Interpretation Parking Offences Urban Road Regulation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Wolman

Claimant/appellant

Islington London Borough Council

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

1 Interpretation of the word 'on' in Section 15(1) of the Greater London Council (General Powers) Act regarding parking offences

Ratio Decidendi

Permission to appeal is granted because the applicant's argument regarding the interpretation of 'on' in the statute has real prospects of success and raises an issue of importance.

Court Disposition

Permission to appeal granted

Orders

Appeal to be listed for three hours and heard by two Lords Justices