The Financial Conduct Authority v Ferreira [2022] EWCA Civ 397 (25 March 2022)
To be liable as 'knowingly concerned' under section 382 FSMA for contravention of section 21, a person must have knowledge of the facts that make the act a contravention, including the absence of approval by an authorised person or the non-applicability of any exemption. Mere knowledge of the making of a communication is insufficient.
- Citation
- [2022] EWCA Civ 397
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: The Financial Conduct Authority; Defendant/appellant: Karen Ferreira
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Interpretation, Director Liability, Financial Promotion, Restitution Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Financial Conduct Authority
Claimant/respondent
Karen Ferreira
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether knowledge of the absence of approval by an authorised person is required for liability as 'knowingly concerned' under section 382 FSMA in contravention of section 21 FSMA
Ratio Decidendi
To be liable as 'knowingly concerned' under section 382 FSMA for contravention of section 21, a person must have knowledge of the facts that make the act a contravention, including the absence of approval by an authorised person or the non-applicability of any exemption. Mere knowledge of the making of a communication is insufficient.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order against Ms. Ferreira under section 382 FSMA set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment