Cox & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v The Oil And Gas Authority & Ors [2022] EWHC 75 (Admin) (18 January 2022)
The OGA's definition of 'economically recoverable' petroleum on a pre-tax basis is consistent with the statutory objective in section 9A of the Petroleum Act 1998 and does not frustrate statutory purpose. The statutory language is open-textured and Parliament intended the expert regulator to determine the method of economic assessment, subject only to rationality. The Claimants failed to show that the OGA's approach was irrational or unlawful, and the Strategy properly integrates climate obligations within the OGA's remit.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 75 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Jeremy Cox; Claimant: Mikaela Loach; Claimant: Kairin van Sweeden; First Defendant: The Oil and Gas Authority; Second Defendant: Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 January 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Substantive Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Interpretation, Judicial Review, Climate Change Policy, Regulatory Powers, Oil and Gas Regulation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jeremy Cox
Claimant
Mikaela Loach
Claimant
Kairin van Sweeden
Claimant
The Oil and Gas Authority
First Defendant
Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Substantive Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Oil and Gas Authority's definition of 'economically recoverable' petroleum in its Strategy is consistent with the statutory objective in section 9A of the Petroleum Act 1998 or frustrates statutory purpose
- 2 Whether the adoption of a pre-tax approach to 'economically recoverable' is irrational in light of the UK's net zero climate obligations
Ratio Decidendi
The OGA's definition of 'economically recoverable' petroleum on a pre-tax basis is consistent with the statutory objective in section 9A of the Petroleum Act 1998 and does not frustrate statutory purpose. The statutory language is open-textured and Parliament intended the expert regulator to determine the method of economic assessment, subject only to rationality. The Claimants failed to show that the OGA's approach was irrational or unlawful, and the Strategy properly integrates climate obligations within the OGA's remit.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- The claim for judicial review is refused.
- No declarations granted as sought by the Claimants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment