Evans v Wimbledon And Putney Commons Conservators
The Wimbledon and Putney Commons Conservators have statutory power under section 8 of the 1871 Act to grant easements and, under section 39, to make and maintain roads and related works as necessary or proper, provided these actions are consistent with their overall statutory objectives. Section 35 does not prohibit such grants, and section 36 does not impose an absolute bar on works authorised elsewhere in the Act. The proposed deed of easement and associated works are within the Conservators' powers.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Nicholas Charles Evans; Defendant/respondent: Wimbledon and Putney Commons Conservators; Interested Party/respondent: London Borough of Wandsworth
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (appeal) / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Interpretation, Powers of Conservators, Easements, Public Open Spaces, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nicholas Charles Evans
Claimant/appellant
Wimbledon and Putney Commons Conservators
Defendant/respondent
London Borough of Wandsworth
Interested Party/respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (appeal) / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Wimbledon and Putney Commons Conservators have the statutory power under the Wimbledon and Putney Commons Act 1871 to grant easements and construct access roads and related works over the Common for the benefit of adjoining landowners, in light of their duties to preserve the Common as open space.
Ratio Decidendi
The Wimbledon and Putney Commons Conservators have statutory power under section 8 of the 1871 Act to grant easements and, under section 39, to make and maintain roads and related works as necessary or proper, provided these actions are consistent with their overall statutory objectives. Section 35 does not prohibit such grants, and section 36 does not impose an absolute bar on works authorised elsewhere in the Act. The proposed deed of easement and associated works are within the Conservators' powers.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment