Tamworth Borough Council v Cocking [2002] EWCA Civ 61 (24 January 2002)

Tamworth Borough Council v Cocking [2002] EWCA Civ 61 (24 January 2002)

The applicant was afforded a fair trial despite self-representation; the judge was entitled to grant the injunction under section 81(5) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990; any issue with the width of the injunction order does not affect the validity of the judgment or provide grounds for appeal.

Citation
[2002] EWCA Civ 61
Parties
Claimant/respondent: Tamworth Borough Council; Defendant/applicant: Byril Cocking
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 January 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Outcome
Permission to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Statutory Nuisance, Injunctions, Right to Fair Trial, Self Representation, Scope of Injunctions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tamworth Borough Council

Claimant/respondent

Byril Cocking

Defendant/applicant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the trial was unfair due to lack of legal representation
  2. 2 Whether the judge erred in granting an injunction under section 81(5) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990
  3. 3 Whether the terms of the injunction were too wide

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant was afforded a fair trial despite self-representation; the judge was entitled to grant the injunction under section 81(5) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990; any issue with the width of the injunction order does not affect the validity of the judgment or provide grounds for appeal.

Court Disposition

Permission to appeal refused

Orders

  • Permission to appeal refused