Kerr v Stephens [2006] EWCA Civ 187 (15 February 2006)
The trial judge's finding that Miss Stephens maintained sufficient connection and occupation of 6 Upton Road as her residence was a question of fact and degree, properly determined by applying ordinary common sense. The judge's decision was open to him on the evidence and not perverse; therefore, the appeal must be dismissed.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 187
- Parties
- Defendant/appellant: John Kerr; Claimant/respondent: Raye Stephens
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 February 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From County Court / Appeal Determination
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Tenancy, Residence Requirement, Quiet Enjoyment, Repairing Obligations, Possession Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Kerr
Defendant/appellant
Raye Stephens
Claimant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From County Court / Appeal Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Miss Stephens ceased to occupy 6 Upton Road as her residence under section 2(1)(a) Rent Act 1977
- 2 Whether the statutory tenancy survived based on residence
- 3 Whether the judge erred in law in determining residence
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge's finding that Miss Stephens maintained sufficient connection and occupation of 6 Upton Road as her residence was a question of fact and degree, properly determined by applying ordinary common sense. The judge's decision was open to him on the evidence and not perverse; therefore, the appeal must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- No order on Respondent's Notice application
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment