ADT Auctions Ltd v Secretary Of State For Environment, Transport & Regions & Anor [2000] EWHC Admin 305 (16 March 2000)
The Secretary of State lawfully dismissed the claimant's planning appeal after properly reopening the inquiry to consider the environmental assessment, lawfully allowing the second Inspector to reassess environmental issues, and applying the correct legal test under Regulation 48(5) of the Conservation (Natural Habitats) Regulations 1994. There was no legitimate expectation restricting the scope of the reopened inquiry, no procedural unfairness, and the Secretary of State gave adequate reasons for his decision, including for departing from previous planning decisions and for preferring the second Inspector's conclusions.
- Citation
- [2000] EWHC Admin 305
- Parties
- Claimant: Claimant (not named in extract); First Defendant: Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions; Second Defendant: Hart District Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Statutory Appeal Under Section 288(1)(a) Town and Country Planning Act 1990 / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Appeals, Environmental Impact Assessment, Planning Permission, Legitimate Expectation, Procedural Fairness, Conservation (natural Habitats) Regulations, Town and Country Planning (assessment of Environmental Effects) Regulations, Consistency in Planning Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Claimant (not named in extract)
Claimant
Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions
First Defendant
Hart District Council
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Statutory Appeal Under Section 288(1)(a) Town and Country Planning Act 1990 / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Secretary of State lawfully dismissed the claimant's planning appeal after a reopened inquiry and environmental assessment
- 2 Whether the conduct and remit of the reopened inquiry were procedurally fair and lawful
- 3 Whether the Secretary of State failed to give adequate reasons for departing from previous planning decisions and for preferring the second Inspector's conclusions over the first Inspector's
Ratio Decidendi
The Secretary of State lawfully dismissed the claimant's planning appeal after properly reopening the inquiry to consider the environmental assessment, lawfully allowing the second Inspector to reassess environmental issues, and applying the correct legal test under Regulation 48(5) of the Conservation (Natural Habitats) Regulations 1994. There was no legitimate expectation restricting the scope of the reopened inquiry, no procedural unfairness, and the Secretary of State gave adequate reasons for his decision, including for departing from previous planning decisions and for preferring the second Inspector's conclusions.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment