Sikander Grocers Ltd v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] EWHC 883 (KB) (16 April 2026)

Sikander Grocers Ltd v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] EWHC 883 (KB) (16 April 2026)

The statutory time limit for bringing an appeal under section 17 of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 is strict, but where the appellant's solicitors acted reasonably, were misled by court staff, and the delay was caused by the court's own actions, it would be wrong and disproportionate to bar the appeal. The court has discretion in exceptional circumstances to allow the appeal to proceed out of time to avoid infringing Article 6 ECHR rights.

Citation
[2026] EWHC 883 (KB)
Parties
Appellant/claimant: Sikander Grocers Limited; Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 April 2026
Procedural Posture
Statutory Appeal Under Section 17 of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 / Appeal From County Court Decision Refusing to Extend Time for Appeal; High Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed; order of HHJ Murch set aside; appeal may proceed
Legal Topics
Statutory Appeals, Time Limits for Appeals, Court Fees, Access to Justice, Article 6 ECHR

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sikander Grocers Limited

Appellant/claimant

Secretary of State for the Home Department

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Statutory Appeal Under Section 17 of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 / Appeal From County Court Decision Refusing to Extend Time for Appeal; High Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the statutory time limit for bringing an appeal under section 17 of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 can be extended in exceptional circumstances
  2. 2 Whether the actions of the court and its staff can justify an extension of time where the appellant's solicitors made a trivial error in the payee on the cheque for the court fee
  3. 3 Whether the right of access to a court under Article 6 ECHR requires a discretion to extend time in these circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

The statutory time limit for bringing an appeal under section 17 of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 is strict, but where the appellant's solicitors acted reasonably, were misled by court staff, and the delay was caused by the court's own actions, it would be wrong and disproportionate to bar the appeal. The court has discretion in exceptional circumstances to allow the appeal to proceed out of time to avoid infringing Article 6 ECHR rights.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; order of HHJ Murch set aside; appeal may proceed

Orders

  • The appeal may proceed out of time
  • No determination on any other application