Farnham Town Council v Secretary of State for Levelling Up Housing & Communities & Anor [2024] EWHC 2458 (Admin) (03 October 2024)
The court held that, in light of amendments to the Civil Procedure Rules and Practice Direction 54D, the statutory 6-week period for both issue and service of a section 288 challenge is absolute. The court's discretion to extend time for service is limited and must be exercised by analogy with CPR 7.6. As the claimant could not satisfy the criteria analogous to CPR 7.6(3), the application to extend time for service must be refused and the claim fails.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 2458 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Farnham Town Council; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Levelling Up Housing & Communities; Second Defendant: Wates Developments Limited; Third Defendant: Waverley Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Statutory Challenge Under Section 288 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990 / Application to Extend Time for Service and Permission to Proceed With Statutory Review
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Challenge, Extension of Time, Service of Proceedings, Planning Permission, Judicial Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Farnham Town Council
Claimant
Secretary of State for Levelling Up Housing & Communities
First Defendant
Wates Developments Limited
Second Defendant
Waverley Borough Council
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Statutory Challenge Under Section 288 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990 / Application to Extend Time for Service and Permission to Proceed With Statutory Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has power to extend time for service of proceedings in a statutory challenge under section 288 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990
- 2 Whether, if such power exists, it should be exercised in favour of the claimant
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that, in light of amendments to the Civil Procedure Rules and Practice Direction 54D, the statutory 6-week period for both issue and service of a section 288 challenge is absolute. The court's discretion to extend time for service is limited and must be exercised by analogy with CPR 7.6. As the claimant could not satisfy the criteria analogous to CPR 7.6(3), the application to extend time for service must be refused and the claim fails.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Application to extend time for service refused
- Claim under section 288 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990 dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment