Farnham Town Council v Secretary of State for Levelling Up Housing & Communities & Ors
The court has no power to extend time for service of a statutory challenge under section 288 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990; even if such power existed, the Claimant could not satisfy the criteria for extension. The Inspector lawfully found conflict with policy FNP10 as a whole, and gave adequate and intelligible reasons. The claim fails on all grounds.
- Parties
- Claimant: Farnham Town Council; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Levelling Up Housing & Communities; Second Defendant: Wates Developments Limited; Third Defendant: Waverley Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Statutory Challenge Under Section 288 Town & Country Planning Act 1990 / Judgment After Rolled Up Hearing on Extension of Time and Substantive Claim
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Challenge, Extension of Time for Service, Interpretation of Planning Policy, Adequacy of Reasons, Material Considerations in Planning, Neighbourhood Plans
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Farnham Town Council
Claimant
Secretary of State for Levelling Up Housing & Communities
First Defendant
Wates Developments Limited
Second Defendant
Waverley Borough Council
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Statutory Challenge Under Section 288 Town & Country Planning Act 1990 / Judgment After Rolled Up Hearing on Extension of Time and Substantive Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has power to extend time for service of a statutory challenge under section 288 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990
- 2 Whether, if such power exists, it should be exercised in favour of the Claimant
- 3 Whether the Inspector failed to have regard to a material consideration (policy FNP10(c))
Ratio Decidendi
The court has no power to extend time for service of a statutory challenge under section 288 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990; even if such power existed, the Claimant could not satisfy the criteria for extension. The Inspector lawfully found conflict with policy FNP10 as a whole, and gave adequate and intelligible reasons. The claim fails on all grounds.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Claim dismissed in its entirety
- No extension of time for service granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment