Harpers Leisure International Ltd, R (on the application of) v Chief Constable of Surrey & Anor [2009] EWHC 2160 (Admin) (13 July 2009)
The Licensing Act 2003 provides an exhaustive statutory scheme for the review of premises licences, including express grounds for rejecting review applications. There is no implied power for a licensing sub-committee to stay or strike out proceedings for abuse of process beyond those grounds. The sub-committee was correct in concluding it had no such power.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 2160 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Harpers Leisure International Limited; First Defendant: Chief Constable of Surrey; Second Defendant: Guildford Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Permission and Substantive Hearing in the Administrative Court
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Construction of Licensing Act 2003, Powers of Licensing Sub Committees, Abuse of Process, Judicial Review of Licensing Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Harpers Leisure International Limited
Claimant
Chief Constable of Surrey
First Defendant
Guildford Borough Council
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Permission and Substantive Hearing in the Administrative Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a licensing sub-committee has the power to stay or strike out proceedings for review of a premises licence on grounds of abuse of process beyond those expressly provided in section 51 of the Licensing Act 2003
Ratio Decidendi
The Licensing Act 2003 provides an exhaustive statutory scheme for the review of premises licences, including express grounds for rejecting review applications. There is no implied power for a licensing sub-committee to stay or strike out proceedings for abuse of process beyond those grounds. The sub-committee was correct in concluding it had no such power.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Claim for judicial review dismissed
- Claimant to pay Second Defendant's costs in the sum of £28,156
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment