Agilo Ltd v Henry [2010] EWHC 2717 (Ch) (22 October 2010)
The statutory demands were invalid because they were served by Agilo Ltd, which was not the creditor entitled to enforce the guarantees or present a bankruptcy petition; there was at least a substantial dispute as to Agilo Ltd's entitlement, and no statutory demand had been served by or on behalf of Agilo Master Fund Limited, the actual creditor.
- Citation
- [2010] EWHC 2717 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Agilo Ltd; Defendant/respondent: William Henry
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 October 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Orders Setting Aside Statutory Demands
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Demand, Personal Guarantee, Right to Sue, Agency, Bankruptcy Petition, Defective Statutory Demand
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Agilo Ltd
Claimant/appellant
William Henry
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Orders Setting Aside Statutory Demands
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether statutory demands served by Agilo Ltd (as agent) instead of Agilo Master Fund Limited (the principal/creditor) are valid for bankruptcy proceedings
- 2 Whether the guarantees conferred a right to sue on Agilo Ltd as agent
- 3 Whether any technical defect in the statutory demand justifies setting it aside
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory demands were invalid because they were served by Agilo Ltd, which was not the creditor entitled to enforce the guarantees or present a bankruptcy petition; there was at least a substantial dispute as to Agilo Ltd's entitlement, and no statutory demand had been served by or on behalf of Agilo Master Fund Limited, the actual creditor.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appellant's appeals from the orders setting aside the statutory demands are dismissed.
- Court to hear parties on Mr Mark Henry's cross appeal as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment