Raglan Housing Association v Southhampton City Council & Anor
There is a serious question to be tried as to whether the judge applied the correct legal test in determining if the culvert had become a sewer, focusing on physical changes rather than the nature of the flow, thus permission to appeal is granted.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Raglan Housing Association Ltd; First Defendant: Southampton City Council; Second Defendant/applicant: Southern Water Services Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Permission to Appeal Granted After Refusal on Papers
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Interpretation, Responsibility for Maintenance of Watercourses, Definition of Sewer and Watercourse
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Raglan Housing Association Ltd
Claimant/respondent
Southampton City Council
First Defendant
Southern Water Services Ltd
Second Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Permission to Appeal Granted After Refusal on Papers
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the culvert is a sewer or a watercourse
- 2 Whether Southern Water Services Ltd has statutory responsibility for maintenance of the culvert
- 3 Correct legal test for transformation of a natural stream into a sewer
Ratio Decidendi
There is a serious question to be tried as to whether the judge applied the correct legal test in determining if the culvert had become a sewer, focusing on physical changes rather than the nature of the flow, thus permission to appeal is granted.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted
Orders
- Applicant to refer the matter to the Court of Appeal Mediation Scheme and seek consent of other parties before further litigation
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment