Powell, R (on the application of) v The Brighton Marina Company Ltd & Ors
The Brighton Marina Act 1968 provides a continuing power to extend, enlarge, alter, replace or relay the works authorised under Section 5(1), not limited by the 1979 completion date. Section 40 permits development on any part of works numbers 1-9 inclusive, including underground car parks, within statutory controls. The works being constructed are within statutory authorisation. The claim was not brought promptly, and substantial prejudice would result from granting relief.
- Parties
- Claimant: Robert Powell; First Defendant: The Brighton Marina Company Limited; Second Defendant: West Quay Development Company Partnership LLP; Third Defendant: Marine Management Organisation; Interested Party: Brighton and Hove City Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Interpretation, Delay in Judicial Review, Local Act Powers, Marine Licensing, Development Control
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Powell
Claimant
The Brighton Marina Company Limited
First Defendant
West Quay Development Company Partnership LLP
Second Defendant
Marine Management Organisation
Third Defendant
Brighton and Hove City Council
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether phase 1 development is authorised by Section 5(2) of the Brighton Marina Act 1968
- 2 Whether Section 5(2) powers are subject to the time limit in Section 23
- 3 Whether Section 40 is an exhaustive statement of development powers
Ratio Decidendi
The Brighton Marina Act 1968 provides a continuing power to extend, enlarge, alter, replace or relay the works authorised under Section 5(1), not limited by the 1979 completion date. Section 40 permits development on any part of works numbers 1-9 inclusive, including underground car parks, within statutory controls. The works being constructed are within statutory authorisation. The claim was not brought promptly, and substantial prejudice would result from granting relief.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment