BDW Trading Ltd (t/as David Wilson Homes (Central, Mercia and West Midlands)) v The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor
The Inspector erred in law by failing to expressly determine whether the development accorded with the development plan as a whole, which was material to the statutory presumption and outcome; the error was not merely formal but substantive, and the decision must be quashed.
- Parties
- Claimant: BDW Trading Limited (trading as David Wilson Homes (Central, Mercia and West Midlands)); First Defendant: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Defendant: Stafford Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (statutory Appeal Under Section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990) / Judgment on Application to Quash Planning Decision
- Outcome
- Application allowed; Inspector's decision quashed.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Interpretation, Development Plan Compliance, Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Development, Planning Policy, Reasoning Adequacy, Planning Conditions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BDW Trading Limited (trading as David Wilson Homes (Central, Mercia and West Midlands))
Claimant
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
First Defendant
Stafford Borough Council
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (statutory Appeal Under Section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990) / Judgment on Application to Quash Planning Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Inspector failed to determine if the development accorded with the development plan as a whole
- 2 Whether the presumption in favour of sustainable development was misapplied
- 3 Whether adequate reasons were given for finding harm to residential amenity
Ratio Decidendi
The Inspector erred in law by failing to expressly determine whether the development accorded with the development plan as a whole, which was material to the statutory presumption and outcome; the error was not merely formal but substantive, and the decision must be quashed.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; Inspector's decision quashed.
Orders
- The Inspector’s decision of 24 October 2014 is quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment