Middlewich Town Council v Middlewich Cemetery Joint Committee Board & Ors
The Court found that the Cemetery is owned by the Claimant and subject to the Local Government Act 1972, rendering the Tomlin Order void. The Defendants must deliver up all records and control of the Cemetery, provide an account for all funds, and explain discrepancies. The injunction is extended to the First to Sixth Defendants, including material relating to the Outlook email account and all relevant bank accounts. The Sixth and Seventh Defendants are not liable to provide an account or bear liability for misappropriated funds due to lack of involvement.
- Parties
- Claimant: Middlewich Town Council; First Defendant: Middlewich Cemetery Joint Committee Board; Second Defendant: Simon McGrory; Third Defendant: Jean Eaton; Fourth Defendant: Sonya Edwards; Fifth Defendant: Claire Armstrong; Sixth Defendant: Nicola Antoney; Seventh Defendant: William Walmsley
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 May 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim substantially allowed; Tomlin Order set aside; injunction and orders for account granted against First to Fifth Defendants and in part against Sixth Defendant; further hearing ordered for ancillary matters.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Interpretation of Local Government Act 1972, Delegation of Statutory Functions, Injunctions, Misappropriation of Public Funds, Bank Account Control, Provision of Accounts, Tomlin Orders, Ownership of Public Cemeteries
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Middlewich Town Council
Claimant
Middlewich Cemetery Joint Committee Board
First Defendant
Simon McGrory
Second Defendant
Jean Eaton
Third Defendant
Sonya Edwards
Fourth Defendant
Claire Armstrong
Fifth Defendant
Nicola Antoney
Sixth Defendant
William Walmsley
Seventh Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tomlin Order was void and should be set aside due to statutory illegality
- 2 Whether the Claimant is the lawful owner and burial authority for the Cemetery
- 3 Whether the Defendants must deliver up all records and control of the Cemetery
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the Cemetery is owned by the Claimant and subject to the Local Government Act 1972, rendering the Tomlin Order void. The Defendants must deliver up all records and control of the Cemetery, provide an account for all funds, and explain discrepancies. The injunction is extended to the First to Sixth Defendants, including material relating to the Outlook email account and all relevant bank accounts. The Sixth and Seventh Defendants are not liable to provide an account or bear liability for misappropriated funds due to lack of involvement.
Court Disposition
Claim substantially allowed; Tomlin Order set aside; injunction and orders for account granted against First to Fifth Defendants and in part against Sixth Defendant; further hearing ordered for ancillary matters.
Orders
- Tomlin Order set aside and stay on 2022 proceedings lifted.
- 2022 and 2025 proceedings consolidated.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment