Yusuf v London Borough of Lewisham [2015] EWCA Civ 1604 (17 December 2015)
There is an arguable point of principle that the local authority was required to consider the suitability of accommodation, including statutory overcrowding, when discharging its duty, regardless of whether the applicant raised the issue before vacating the property.
- Citation
- [2015] EWCA Civ 1604
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Yusuf; Defendant/defendant: London Borough of Lewisham
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Under Section 204 of the Housing Act 1996 / Permission to Appeal Granted by Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Overcrowding, Suitability of Accommodation, Local Authority Duties, Homelessness, Review of Housing Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yusuf
Claimant/applicant
London Borough of Lewisham
Defendant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under Section 204 of the Housing Act 1996 / Permission to Appeal Granted by Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accommodation provided was statutorily overcrowded under section 325 of the Housing Act 1985
- 2 Whether the reviewing officer was required to consider suitability of accommodation under section 206 and section 210(1) of the Housing Act 1996, even if not raised by the applicant
- 3 Whether failure to raise overcrowding before leaving the accommodation absolved the authority of its duty
Ratio Decidendi
There is an arguable point of principle that the local authority was required to consider the suitability of accommodation, including statutory overcrowding, when discharging its duty, regardless of whether the applicant raised the issue before vacating the property.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted
Orders
- Permission to appeal is granted to the applicant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment