Evans v Wimbledon And Putney Commons Conservators [2014] EWCA Civ 940 (09 July 2014)
The Conservators have statutory power under s.8 of the 1871 Act to grant easements over the Common, and the proposed works (including tarmacing, barriers, mounds, bollards) are authorised by s.39 as necessary or proper for the protection and maintenance of the Common. The duties under ss.34 and 36 are qualified by these express powers, and the grant does not breach statutory obligations to preserve the commons as open space or its natural aspect.
- Citation
- [2014] EWCA Civ 940
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Nicholas Charles Evans; Defendant/respondent: Wimbledon and Putney Commons Conservators; Interested Party/respondent: London Borough of Wandsworth
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court (administrative Court)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Powers of Conservators, Grant of Easements, Preservation of Commons, Interpretation of Wimbledon and Putney Commons Act 1871
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nicholas Charles Evans
Claimant/appellant
Wimbledon and Putney Commons Conservators
Defendant/respondent
London Borough of Wandsworth
Interested Party/respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court (administrative Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Wimbledon and Putney Commons Conservators have statutory power under the 1871 Act to grant easements over the Common for access to adjoining land
- 2 Whether the proposed works (tarmacing, barriers, mounds, bollards) breach the Conservators' duties to preserve the commons as open space and maintain its natural aspect under ss.34 and 36 of the 1871 Act
Ratio Decidendi
The Conservators have statutory power under s.8 of the 1871 Act to grant easements over the Common, and the proposed works (including tarmacing, barriers, mounds, bollards) are authorised by s.39 as necessary or proper for the protection and maintenance of the Common. The duties under ss.34 and 36 are qualified by these express powers, and the grant does not breach statutory obligations to preserve the commons as open space or its natural aspect.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment