Middlewich Town Council v Middlewich Cemetery Joint Committee Board & Ors [2026] EWHC 200 (KB) (04 February 2026)
The Court found that the Claimant is the lawful owner and burial authority for Middlewich Cemetery, that the Tomlin Order was void and unenforceable as it purported to delegate statutory functions contrary to the Local Government Act 1972, and that the Defendants must deliver up all remaining records, documents, and control of the Cemetery, provide a full account of all Cemetery funds, and pay over any misappropriated sums. The interim injunction was extended and made final against all Defendants, including in respect of all relevant bank accounts and materials. The Outlook e-mail account material must also be delivered up if available.
- Citation
- [2026] EWHC 200 (KB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Middlewich Town Council; First Defendant: Middlewich Cemetery Joint Committee Board; Second Defendant: Simon McGrory; Third Defendant: Jean Eaton; Fourth Defendant: Sonya Edwards; Fifth Defendant: Claire Armstrong; Sixth Defendant: Nicola Antoney; Seventh Defendant: William Walmsley
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 February 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Claim (injunctions, Declarations, Account, Consolidation) / Final Trial and Judgment After Interim Relief and Consolidation of 2022 and 2025 Proceedings
- Outcome
- Claim allowed. Tomlin Order set aside. Stay lifted on 2022 proceedings. Proceedings consolidated. Final injunctive and declaratory relief granted.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Powers of Parish Councils, Delegation of Cemetery Management, Enforceability of Tomlin Orders, Misappropriation of Public Funds, Provision of Accounts, Banking Irregularities, Ownership of Public Cemeteries
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Middlewich Town Council
Claimant
Middlewich Cemetery Joint Committee Board
First Defendant
Simon McGrory
Second Defendant
Jean Eaton
Third Defendant
Sonya Edwards
Fourth Defendant
Claire Armstrong
Fifth Defendant
Nicola Antoney
Sixth Defendant
William Walmsley
Seventh Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim (injunctions, Declarations, Account, Consolidation) / Final Trial and Judgment After Interim Relief and Consolidation of 2022 and 2025 Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tomlin Order of 2024 was void and unenforceable due to statutory illegality
- 2 Whether the Claimant is the lawful owner and burial authority for Middlewich Cemetery
- 3 Whether the Defendants must deliver up all records, documents, and control of the Cemetery to the Claimant
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the Claimant is the lawful owner and burial authority for Middlewich Cemetery, that the Tomlin Order was void and unenforceable as it purported to delegate statutory functions contrary to the Local Government Act 1972, and that the Defendants must deliver up all remaining records, documents, and control of the Cemetery, provide a full account of all Cemetery funds, and pay over any misappropriated sums. The interim injunction was extended and made final against all Defendants, including in respect of all relevant bank accounts and materials. The Outlook e-mail account material must also be delivered up if available.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed. Tomlin Order set aside. Stay lifted on 2022 proceedings. Proceedings consolidated. Final injunctive and declaratory relief granted.
Orders
- Tomlin Order of 2024 set aside as void and unenforceable.
- Stay on 2022 proceedings lifted; proceedings consolidated with 2025 claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment