Wainhomes (North-West) Ltd v Secretary of State for Housing Communities and Local Government [2020] EWHC 2294 (Admin) (21 August 2020)
The Inspector erred in law by failing to expressly consider whether the distribution of the housing requirement resulting from the application of the Standard Methodology within the Housing Market Area would render Policy G3 out of date, irrespective of whether the Council could demonstrate a five year supply of housing land. The Inspector also failed to give adequate reasons and did not take into account a material consideration as required. The decision was therefore quashed for these reasons, as conceded by the Secretary of State.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 2294 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Wainhomes (North-West) Limited; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Housing Communities and Local Government; Second Defendant: South Ribble Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 August 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (planning Statutory Review Under S.288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990) / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part; Inspector's decision quashed for failure to give adequate reasons and failure to consider a material consideration.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Review of Planning Appeal Decision, Interpretation of National Planning Policy Framework (nppf), Five Year Housing Land Supply, Review of Strategic Housing Policies, Material Error of Fact in Planning Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wainhomes (North-West) Limited
Claimant
Secretary of State for Housing Communities and Local Government
First Defendant
South Ribble Borough Council
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (planning Statutory Review Under S.288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990) / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Inspector erred in law in concluding that the 2017 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and associated processes did not amount to a review under footnote 37 of the NPPF for the purposes of calculating five year housing land supply
- 2 Whether the Inspector made a material error of fact regarding references to Core Strategy Policy 4 in committee reports
- 3 Whether the Inspector's reasons were adequate and intelligible
Ratio Decidendi
The Inspector erred in law by failing to expressly consider whether the distribution of the housing requirement resulting from the application of the Standard Methodology within the Housing Market Area would render Policy G3 out of date, irrespective of whether the Council could demonstrate a five year supply of housing land. The Inspector also failed to give adequate reasons and did not take into account a material consideration as required. The decision was therefore quashed for these reasons, as conceded by the Secretary of State.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part; Inspector's decision quashed for failure to give adequate reasons and failure to consider a material consideration.
Orders
- The Inspector's decision dated 13 December 2019 is quashed.
- Matter remitted for redetermination in accordance with the judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment