Rogers v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities & Anor [2023] EWHC 2528 (Admin) (13 October 2023)
The failure to serve the sealed claim form in time was due to matters outside the Claimant's control and the Claimant's representatives took reasonable steps to effect service. The Inspector's approach to temporary planning permission is arguably unlawful for failing to reduce the weight attached to Green Belt harm for a temporary permission and not considering a longer temporary period. The Inspector's consideration of the best interests of the children was lawful and adequate.
- Citation
- [2023] EWHC 2528 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr Bryan Rogers; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities; Second Defendant: South Staffordshire District Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 October 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Statutory Review and Appeal Under Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (sections 288 and 289) / Permission Application and Extension of Time for Service
- Outcome
- Permission granted on ground 1 (temporary planning permission); refused on ground 2 (best interests of children). Extension of time for service granted.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Review Under S.288 TCPA 1990, Appeal Under S.289 TCPA 1990, Extension of Time for Service, Green Belt Planning Policy, Temporary Planning Permission, Best Interests of Children in Planning Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Bryan Rogers
Claimant
Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
First Defendant
South Staffordshire District Council
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Statutory Review and Appeal Under Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (sections 288 and 289) / Permission Application and Extension of Time for Service
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should extend time for service of the sealed claim form under s.288 TCPA 1990
- 2 Whether the Inspector erred in approach to temporary planning permission in the Green Belt
- 3 Whether the Inspector erred in consideration of the best interests of the children
Ratio Decidendi
The failure to serve the sealed claim form in time was due to matters outside the Claimant's control and the Claimant's representatives took reasonable steps to effect service. The Inspector's approach to temporary planning permission is arguably unlawful for failing to reduce the weight attached to Green Belt harm for a temporary permission and not considering a longer temporary period. The Inspector's consideration of the best interests of the children was lawful and adequate.
Court Disposition
Permission granted on ground 1 (temporary planning permission); refused on ground 2 (best interests of children). Extension of time for service granted.
Orders
- Extension of time for service of the sealed claim form up to and including the last date of service on the Defendants.
- Permission to proceed on ground 1 (temporary planning permission) granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment