Perotti v Watson [2002] EWCA Civ 662 (30 April 2002)
The application for permission to appeal was refused because the applicant's prospects of success in related litigation were speculative, the judge below had properly considered all relevant matters, and there was no breach of Article 6 or evidence of bias.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 662
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Angelo Perotti; Defendant/respondent: Kenneth Corbett Watson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Applications refused
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Possession Orders, Charging Orders, Article 6 ECHR, Litigant in Person, Bias, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Angelo Perotti
Claimant/applicant
Kenneth Corbett Watson
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a stay of execution of possession and sale orders should be granted pending other litigation
- 2 Whether the applicant's human rights under Article 6 ECHR were breached
- 3 Whether the judge was biased or failed to provide a fair hearing
Ratio Decidendi
The application for permission to appeal was refused because the applicant's prospects of success in related litigation were speculative, the judge below had properly considered all relevant matters, and there was no breach of Article 6 or evidence of bias.
Court Disposition
Applications refused
Orders
- Applications for permission to appeal refused
- Mr Perotti to be provided with a copy of the judgment at public expense
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment