Dennis Rye Ltd v Mansfield District Council [2002] EWCA Civ 767 (15 May 2002)

There was no proper justification for the delay, and no real prospect of success in the underlying appeal; therefore, it was not just or proportionate to lift the stay.

Citation: [2002] EWCA Civ 767
Parties: Claimant/applicant: Dennis Rye Limited; Defendant/respondent: Mansfield District Council
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 15 May 2002
Procedural Posture: Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Outcome: Application for permission to appeal refused; extension of time granted for the purpose of considering the merits.
Legal Topics: Stay of Proceedings, Extension of Time, Council Tax Exemption, Case Management Discretion

Administrative Law Civil Procedure Stay of Proceedings Extension of Time Council Tax Exemption Case Management Discretion

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

Dennis Rye Limited

Claimant/applicant

Mansfield District Council

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

1 Whether the stay imposed by Civil Procedure Rules should be lifted to allow the appeal to proceed
2 Whether there was a proper explanation for the delay in prosecuting the appeal
3 Whether the underlying appeal had a real prospect of success

Ratio Decidendi

There was no proper justification for the delay, and no real prospect of success in the underlying appeal; therefore, it was not just or proportionate to lift the stay.

Court Disposition

Application for permission to appeal refused; extension of time granted for the purpose of considering the merits.

Orders

Application for extension of time allowed
Application for permission to appeal refused