Bank of India v Firestar Diamond FZE & Ors

Bank of India v Firestar Diamond FZE & Ors

The application for a stay is adjourned to the pre-trial review because it is premature to determine whether Mr Modi's lack of IT/internet access will prevent a fair trial; further case management directions are made to mitigate any inequality of arms. The application for inspection of the three original documents is granted as it is reasonable and proportionate in the circumstances.

Parties
Claimant: Bank of India; First Defendant: Firestar Diamond FZE; Second Defendant: Firestar International Private Limited; Third Defendant: Nirav Deepak Modi
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 February 2025
Procedural Posture
Commercial Claim (enforcement of Personal Guarantee) / Interlocutory Applications (stay and Inspection of Documents)
Outcome
Stay application adjourned to PTR; inspection application granted
Legal Topics
Stay of Proceedings, Fair Trial Rights (article 6 Echr), Inspection of Documents, Inequality of Arms, Prisoner Litigants, Personal Guarantee Enforcement
Civil Procedure Banking Law Human Rights Stay of Proceedings Fair Trial Rights (article 6 Echr) Inspection of Documents Inequality of Arms Prisoner Litigants +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bank of India

Claimant

Firestar Diamond FZE

First Defendant

Firestar International Private Limited

Second Defendant

Nirav Deepak Modi

Third Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Claim (enforcement of Personal Guarantee) / Interlocutory Applications (stay and Inspection of Documents)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the proceedings should be stayed due to the Third Defendant's incarceration and lack of IT/internet access, potentially breaching Article 6 ECHR
  2. 2 Whether the Claimant should be ordered to produce original contractual documents for inspection by a forensic expert

Ratio Decidendi

The application for a stay is adjourned to the pre-trial review because it is premature to determine whether Mr Modi's lack of IT/internet access will prevent a fair trial; further case management directions are made to mitigate any inequality of arms. The application for inspection of the three original documents is granted as it is reasonable and proportionate in the circumstances.

Court Disposition

Stay application adjourned to PTR; inspection application granted

Orders

  • Stay application adjourned to the pre-trial review (PTR)
  • Claimant to provide Mr Modi with hard copies of the Handbook for Litigants in Person, pro bono application form, disclosure, witness statements, expert reports, and the latest edition of the White Book (CPR), subject to undertakings