El Nasharty v J. Sainsbury Plc

El Nasharty v J. Sainsbury Plc

The arbitration agreement is valid and enforceable because the allegations of duress are parasitical to the main contract and do not specifically impeach the arbitration clause; the claimant freely and voluntarily entered into the arbitration agreement, waiving Article 6 rights, and inability to pay arbitration costs does not render the agreement inoperative.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: Amr Amin Hamza El Nasharty; Defendant/applicant: J. Sainsbury Plc
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 November 2007
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Application / Application for Stay of Proceedings Under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996
Outcome
Application granted; proceedings stayed in favour of arbitration.
Legal Topics
Stay of Proceedings, Arbitration Agreement Validity, Duress, Article 6 ECHR Waiver, Costs of Arbitration
Arbitration Contract Law Human Rights Stay of Proceedings Arbitration Agreement Validity Duress Article 6 ECHR Waiver Costs of Arbitration

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Amr Amin Hamza El Nasharty

Claimant/respondent

J. Sainsbury Plc

Defendant/applicant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Court Application / Application for Stay of Proceedings Under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the arbitration agreement is inoperative due to duress
  2. 2 Whether Article 6 ECHR precludes a stay in favour of arbitration
  3. 3 Whether inability to pay arbitration costs renders the agreement inoperative

Ratio Decidendi

The arbitration agreement is valid and enforceable because the allegations of duress are parasitical to the main contract and do not specifically impeach the arbitration clause; the claimant freely and voluntarily entered into the arbitration agreement, waiving Article 6 rights, and inability to pay arbitration costs does not render the agreement inoperative.

Court Disposition

Application granted; proceedings stayed in favour of arbitration.

Orders

  • Stay of proceedings as required by Section 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996