O'Shea v. MGN Ltd and others [2001] EWHC QB 425 (4th May, 2001)
The strict liability principle in defamation does not extend to cases where the defamatory material is a photograph of another person who is merely a 'look-alike' of the claimant. To do so would be a disproportionate and unjustifiable interference with freedom of expression under Article 10 ECHR, as there is no pressing social need for such an extension. The claimant's case has no realistic prospect of success as a matter of law.
- Citation
- [2001] EWHC QB 425
- Parties
- Claimant: Kerry O'Shea; First Defendant: MGN Ltd; Second Defendant: Free4Internet.Net Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation Claim (libel) / Judgment on Legal Sufficiency/strike Out Application
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Strict Liability in Defamation, Reference/identification in Libel, Freedom of Expression (article 10 Echr), Look Alike Photographs and Defamation, Offer of Amends Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kerry O'Shea
Claimant
MGN Ltd
First Defendant
Free4Internet.Net Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Defamation Claim (libel) / Judgment on Legal Sufficiency/strike Out Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a claimant can succeed in libel where the defamatory material is a photograph of another person who is a 'look-alike' of the claimant
- 2 Whether the strict liability principle in defamation applies to 'look-alike' situations
- 3 Whether application of strict liability in such cases is compatible with Article 10 ECHR
Ratio Decidendi
The strict liability principle in defamation does not extend to cases where the defamatory material is a photograph of another person who is merely a 'look-alike' of the claimant. To do so would be a disproportionate and unjustifiable interference with freedom of expression under Article 10 ECHR, as there is no pressing social need for such an extension. The claimant's case has no realistic prospect of success as a matter of law.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Claim struck out as having no realistic prospect of success
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment