SAYED S. SANGAMNEHERI v THE CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF ARBITRATORS & ORS.

SAYED S. SANGAMNEHERI v THE CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF ARBITRATORS & ORS.

All claims and applications are totally without merit, barred by res judicata and abuse of process, inadequately pleaded, and misconceived in law; Defendants are entitled to strike out and summary judgment; ECRO is appropriate due to persistent unjust harassment.

Parties
Claimant: Sayed S. Sangamneheri; First Defendant: The Chartered Institute of Arbitrators; Second Defendant: The President of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators; Third Defendant: Waj Khan; Fourth Defendant: Keisha Williams; Fifth Defendant: Chris Udoh; Sixth Defendant: Jonathan Bellamy
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 April 2022
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment on Applications to Strike Out, Summary Judgment, Default Judgment, Declaration, Joinder, and ECRO
Outcome
All claims and applications dismissed as totally without merit; ECRO granted against Claimant; referral to Attorney General ordered.
Legal Topics
Strike Out, Summary Judgment, Res Judicata, Abuse of Process, Arbitrator Immunity, Civil Restraint Orders, Joinder, Default Judgment
Civil Procedure Arbitration Restraint Orders Strike Out Summary Judgment Res Judicata Abuse of Process Arbitrator Immunity +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 25 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sayed S. Sangamneheri

Claimant

The Chartered Institute of Arbitrators

First Defendant

The President of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators

Second Defendant

Waj Khan

Third Defendant

Keisha Williams

Fourth Defendant

Chris Udoh

Fifth Defendant

Jonathan Bellamy

Sixth Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment on Applications to Strike Out, Summary Judgment, Default Judgment, Declaration, Joinder, and ECRO

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claims are barred by res judicata or abuse of process
  2. 2 Whether the claims and applications are totally without merit
  3. 3 Whether the Defendants are entitled to strike out or summary judgment

Ratio Decidendi

All claims and applications are totally without merit, barred by res judicata and abuse of process, inadequately pleaded, and misconceived in law; Defendants are entitled to strike out and summary judgment; ECRO is appropriate due to persistent unjust harassment.

Court Disposition

All claims and applications dismissed as totally without merit; ECRO granted against Claimant; referral to Attorney General ordered.

Orders

  • Strike out of Part 7 and Part 8 Claims
  • Summary judgment for Defendants