Peter Gaisiance v Chief Constable of British Transport Police & Ors

Peter Gaisiance v Chief Constable of British Transport Police & Ors

The claims are vague, incoherent, lack particularity, do not disclose reasonable grounds, are an abuse of process, and fail to comply with court rules and orders. There is no basis on which the Claimant could amend his claim to comply with court rules. The Defendants' applications for strike out and summary judgment are granted. The claims are totally without merit.

Parties
Claimant: Peter Gaisiance; First Defendant: Chief Constable of British Transport Police; Second Defendant: Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis; Third Defendant: First Great Western Limited T/A Great Western; Fourth Defendant: PC 6432; Fifth Defendant: Jack Meary
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
02 October 2025
Procedural Posture
Civil / Strike Out and Summary Judgment Applications
Outcome
Claims struck out and summary judgment granted for Defendants. Claimant's application dismissed. Claims certified totally without merit. Referral for Civil Restraint Order. Costs awarded to Defendants.
Legal Topics
Strike Out, Summary Judgment, Malicious Prosecution, False Imprisonment, Wrongful Arrest, Misfeasance in Public Office, Data Protection, Human Rights, Costs, Civil Restraint Order
Tort Civil Procedure Strike Out Summary Judgment Malicious Prosecution False Imprisonment Wrongful Arrest Misfeasance in Public Office +4 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 28 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Gaisiance

Claimant

Chief Constable of British Transport Police

First Defendant

Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis

Second Defendant

First Great Western Limited T/A Great Western

Third Defendant

PC 6432

Fourth Defendant

Jack Meary

Fifth Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Strike Out and Summary Judgment Applications

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Claimant's claims disclose reasonable grounds for bringing the claim
  2. 2 Whether the statements of case are an abuse of process
  3. 3 Whether the claims are properly particularised

Ratio Decidendi

The claims are vague, incoherent, lack particularity, do not disclose reasonable grounds, are an abuse of process, and fail to comply with court rules and orders. There is no basis on which the Claimant could amend his claim to comply with court rules. The Defendants' applications for strike out and summary judgment are granted. The claims are totally without merit.

Court Disposition

Claims struck out and summary judgment granted for Defendants. Claimant's application dismissed. Claims certified totally without merit. Referral for Civil Restraint Order. Costs awarded to Defendants.

Orders

  • Claim Form and Particulars of Claim struck out
  • Summary judgment granted for First, Second, and Third Defendants