Maloney v Alexander Johnson (A Firm) [2002] EWCA Civ 1544 (14 October 2002)
The information was obtained from Abbey National with the consent of the data controller, so there was no breach of section 55 of the Data Protection Act 1998; no reasonable cause of action was disclosed against the solicitors; no point of general importance or compelling reason for permission to appeal.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 1544
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Neil Maloney; Defendant/respondent: Alexander Johnson (A Firm)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 October 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Strike Out Application, Data Protection Act 1998 Section 55, Solicitor Conduct, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Neil Maloney
Claimant/applicant
Alexander Johnson (A Firm)
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim against the solicitors disclosed a reasonable cause of action under the Data Protection Act 1998 section 55
- 2 Whether there was any point of practice or principle of general importance justifying permission to appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The information was obtained from Abbey National with the consent of the data controller, so there was no breach of section 55 of the Data Protection Act 1998; no reasonable cause of action was disclosed against the solicitors; no point of general importance or compelling reason for permission to appeal.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- Application for extension of time refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment