Alpha Rocks Solicitors v Alade [2015] EWCA Civ 685 (09 July 2015)
It was inappropriate and disproportionate to strike out the entirety of the solicitors' claims for fees on the basis of alleged exaggeration and fabrication without disclosure and cross-examination, given the conflicting evidence; the judge erred in conducting a mini-trial and in concluding that a fair trial was impossible.
- Citation
- [2015] EWCA Civ 685
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Alpha Rocks Solicitors; Defendant/respondent: Benjamin Oluwadare Alade
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Strike Out Applications, Abuse of Process, Solicitors' Costs, Fraudulent Claims, Detailed Assessment of Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alpha Rocks Solicitors
Claimant/appellant
Benjamin Oluwadare Alade
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 When is it appropriate to strike out a claim for abuse of process due to alleged fraudulent or exaggerated solicitor bills?
- 2 Is it permissible to strike out a claim without oral evidence or cross-examination where there are conflicting factual accounts?
Ratio Decidendi
It was inappropriate and disproportionate to strike out the entirety of the solicitors' claims for fees on the basis of alleged exaggeration and fabrication without disclosure and cross-examination, given the conflicting evidence; the judge erred in conducting a mini-trial and in concluding that a fair trial was impossible.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Strike out order set aside
- Costs order below set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment