Crest Nicholson Operations Ltd & Anor v Grafik Architects Ltd & Anor [2021] EWHC 2948 (TCC) (10 November 2021)
The claim should not be struck out as the Particulars of Claim disclose a cause of action and reasonable grounds for bringing the claim; deficiencies in particularity can be addressed by further particulars, and Crest has obtained expert advice and intends to serve an expert report.
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC 2948 (TCC)
- Parties
- First Claimant: Crest Nicholson Operations Limited; Second Claimant: Crest Nicholson (South West) Limited; First Defendant: Grafik Architects Limited; Second Defendant: NHBC Building Control Services Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Strike Out Claim / Pre Trial Interlocutory Hearing
- Outcome
- Application to strike out dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Strike Out Applications, Particulars of Claim, Expert Evidence, Building Regulations, Approved Inspector Duties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Crest Nicholson Operations Limited
First Claimant
Crest Nicholson (South West) Limited
Second Claimant
Grafik Architects Limited
First Defendant
NHBC Building Control Services Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application to Strike Out Claim / Pre Trial Interlocutory Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Particulars of Claim disclose reasonable grounds for bringing the claim
- 2 Whether the claim should be struck out for lack of particularity
- 3 Whether the claim should be struck out for lack of expert evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The claim should not be struck out as the Particulars of Claim disclose a cause of action and reasonable grounds for bringing the claim; deficiencies in particularity can be addressed by further particulars, and Crest has obtained expert advice and intends to serve an expert report.
Court Disposition
Application to strike out dismissed
Orders
- BCS invited to draft an order identifying further particulars required and seek agreement with Crest; if not agreed, court will hear submissions.
- No order for early disclosure at this stage; parties invited to discuss appropriate course.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment