Lynn Phipps v Priory Education Services Ltd
The Employment Tribunal’s refusal to reconsider the strike-out was legally perverse because the claimant was not implicated in her representative’s misconduct, had no fair opportunity to present her case, and the alternative remedy was fanciful; the interests of justice required reconsideration.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Mrs Lynn Phipps; Defendant/respondent: Priory Education Services Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Strike Out of Claim, Reconsideration of Tribunal Decisions, Representative Misconduct, Finality of Litigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Lynn Phipps
Claimant/appellant
Priory Education Services Ltd
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether failings of a party’s representative justify reconsideration of a strike-out order
- 2 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in refusing reconsideration despite claimant's lack of knowledge or involvement in representative's misconduct
- 3 Whether the alternative remedy against the representative is a sufficient reason to deny reconsideration
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal’s refusal to reconsider the strike-out was legally perverse because the claimant was not implicated in her representative’s misconduct, had no fair opportunity to present her case, and the alternative remedy was fanciful; the interests of justice required reconsideration.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Strike-out order of 4 January 2019 revoked
- Decision of 3 July 2019 confirming strike-out revoked
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment