Michael Ashley v The Commissioners for HMRC
There are no strong case management reasons to adopt a two-stage approach; the conventional single hearing is more efficient and appropriate. The court has power to vary the previous order, but HMRC's application for a preliminary hearing is dismissed as it would not resolve all issues and would be inefficient.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Michael Ashley; Defendant/applicant: The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Ruling on Application to Vary Order and for Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Subject Access Request, Enforcement of Court Orders, Case Management, Summary Dismissal, Section 167 Data Protection Act 2018
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Ashley
Claimant/respondent
The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Application / Ruling on Application to Vary Order and for Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether HMRC's application for a preliminary hearing to summarily dismiss parts of the Enforcement Application should be granted
- 2 Whether the court has power to vary the previous order and determine preliminary issues
- 3 Whether section 167 of the Data Protection Act 2018 is available to ground enforcement against the Crown
Ratio Decidendi
There are no strong case management reasons to adopt a two-stage approach; the conventional single hearing is more efficient and appropriate. The court has power to vary the previous order, but HMRC's application for a preliminary hearing is dismissed as it would not resolve all issues and would be inefficient.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- There will be a single hearing of the Enforcement Application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment