Moutarde v SIG Logistics & Anor [2021] EWHC 1670 (QB) (18 June 2021)
The claim for damages had concluded before the hearing began; the only issue determined at the hearing was a discrete costs question, which does not constitute a final contested hearing of the substantive claim under CPR 45.24(1). Therefore, the applicant is only entitled to a 27.5% success fee, not 100%.
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC 1670 (QB)
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Alan Moutarde; Respondent/defendant: SIG Logistics; Respondent/defendant: Transplastix
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Renewed Oral Application for Permission to Appeal / Permission to Appeal Hearing
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Success Fees, CPR Part 45, Employer's Liability Disease Claims, Mesothelioma, Costs Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alan Moutarde
Appellant/claimant
SIG Logistics
Respondent/defendant
Transplastix
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Renewed Oral Application for Permission to Appeal / Permission to Appeal Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim concluded at trial for the purposes of CPR 45.24(1)
- 2 Whether a dispute about costs constitutes a 'final contested hearing' or 'trial' under CPR 45.15, 45.23, and 45.24
Ratio Decidendi
The claim for damages had concluded before the hearing began; the only issue determined at the hearing was a discrete costs question, which does not constitute a final contested hearing of the substantive claim under CPR 45.24(1). Therefore, the applicant is only entitled to a 27.5% success fee, not 100%.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Permission to appeal refused
- Applicant entitled to recover only a 27.5% success fee
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment