MNO v HKC & Anor
A 20% first-stage success fee is not reasonable in a two-stage CFA where the only substantial risk is Part 36; 15% is the maximum reasonable uplift, as informed consent was not adequately established and industry guidance supports a lower figure.
- Parties
- Claimant: MNO; Litigation Friend: KLM; First Defendant: HKC; Second Defendant: DGS
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Assessment / Detailed Assessment of Solicitor Client Costs
- Outcome
- Success fee limited to 15% for first stage; 20% claim rejected.
- Legal Topics
- Success Fees, Conditional Fee Agreements, Solicitor Client Costs, Part 36 Offers, Indemnity Basis Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MNO
Claimant
KLM
Litigation Friend
HKC
First Defendant
DGS
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Costs Assessment / Detailed Assessment of Solicitor Client Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the reasonable success fee payable by the claimant to his solicitors under a two-stage CFA?
- 2 Was the Litigation Friend's approval of the success fee informed, thereby creating a presumption of reasonableness under CPR 46.9(3)?
- 3 Should the first stage success fee exceed 15% in light of industry guidance and relevant case law?
Ratio Decidendi
A 20% first-stage success fee is not reasonable in a two-stage CFA where the only substantial risk is Part 36; 15% is the maximum reasonable uplift, as informed consent was not adequately established and industry guidance supports a lower figure.
Court Disposition
Success fee limited to 15% for first stage; 20% claim rejected.
Orders
- Solicitors may recover a 15% success fee uplift on profit costs from the claimant.
- Any amount above 15% is disallowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment