Djurberg v Thames Properties (Hampton) Ltd & Ors [2023] EWHC 1444 (Ch) (14 June 2023)

Djurberg v Thames Properties (Hampton) Ltd & Ors [2023] EWHC 1444 (Ch) (14 June 2023)

The claimant's claims are fanciful and unsupported by credible evidence; he failed to establish ownership, value, or wrongful deprivation of assets, or any surviving mooring rights; the defendants have shown the claim has no realistic prospect of success and are entitled to summary judgment.

Citation
[2023] EWHC 1444 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Myck Djurberg; First Defendant: Thames Properties (Hampton) Limited; Second Defendant: Rodriguez Doll; Third Defendant: Gregory Collier
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 June 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Property/probate / Application for Strike Out or Reverse Summary Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed by reverse summary judgment in favour of the defendants.
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Strike Out, Conversion, Trespass to Goods, Breach of Settlement Agreement, Mooring Rights, Bankruptcy and Exempt Property
Civil Procedure Property Law Bankruptcy Summary Judgment Strike Out Conversion Trespass to Goods Breach of Settlement Agreement +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Myck Djurberg

Claimant

Thames Properties (Hampton) Limited

First Defendant

Rodriguez Doll

Second Defendant

Gregory Collier

Third Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Property/probate / Application for Strike Out or Reverse Summary Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant has a realistic prospect of success on claims for conversion, breach of agreement, and mooring rights; whether the claim should be struck out or dismissed by summary judgment.

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant's claims are fanciful and unsupported by credible evidence; he failed to establish ownership, value, or wrongful deprivation of assets, or any surviving mooring rights; the defendants have shown the claim has no realistic prospect of success and are entitled to summary judgment.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed by reverse summary judgment in favour of the defendants.

Orders

  • Reverse summary judgment granted to the defendants.
  • Claim dismissed in its entirety.