Banner Universal Motion Pictures Ltd v Wiggin LLP & Anor [2024] EWHC 656 (Ch) (23 February 2024)

Banner Universal Motion Pictures Ltd v Wiggin LLP & Anor [2024] EWHC 656 (Ch) (23 February 2024)

The claims against Fox Williams LLP and Wiggin LLP are dismissed as they disclose no reasonable grounds, are statute-barred, and constitute an abuse of process. Fox Williams did not breach any duty to the Claimant, and the alleged omitted evidence was irrelevant and would not have affected the outcome. Wiggin LLP owed no duty to the Claimant as opposing solicitors. The claims are fundamentally misconceived, vexatious, and unsupported by law or fact.

Citation
[2024] EWHC 656 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Banner Universal Motion Pictures Limited; First Defendant: Wiggin LLP; Second Defendant: Fox Williams LLP
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 February 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil Professional Negligence / Breach of Duty / Summary Judgment and Strike Out Applications
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Strike Out, Limitation, Abuse of Process, Duty of Care, Disclosure, Copyright, Breach of Confidence, Passing Off
Civil Procedure Professional Negligence Contract Law Intellectual Property Summary Judgment Strike Out Limitation Abuse of Process +5 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 7 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Banner Universal Motion Pictures Limited

Claimant

Wiggin LLP

First Defendant

Fox Williams LLP

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Professional Negligence / Breach of Duty / Summary Judgment and Strike Out Applications

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Fox Williams LLP breached contractual, tortious, or professional duties to the Claimant
  2. 2 Whether Wiggin LLP owed any duty to the Claimant and breached it
  3. 3 Whether alleged breaches caused loss to the Claimant

Ratio Decidendi

The claims against Fox Williams LLP and Wiggin LLP are dismissed as they disclose no reasonable grounds, are statute-barred, and constitute an abuse of process. Fox Williams did not breach any duty to the Claimant, and the alleged omitted evidence was irrelevant and would not have affected the outcome. Wiggin LLP owed no duty to the Claimant as opposing solicitors. The claims are fundamentally misconceived, vexatious, and unsupported by law or fact.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • Claims against Fox Williams LLP and Wiggin LLP struck out under CPR 3.4(2)(a) and (b)
  • Summary judgment granted in favour of Fox Williams LLP and Wiggin LLP under CPR 24.2