Perotti v Iliffe Booth Bennett & Ors
The claimant's allegations of negligence had no real prospect of success, the issues had already been determined in previous litigation, and the proceedings constituted an abuse of process. Summary judgment for the defendants was appropriate and permission to appeal was refused.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Angelo Perotti; Defendants/respondents: Iliffe Booth Bennett and Others
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal; Summary Judgment at First Instance
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Abuse of Process, Professional Negligence, Costs Orders, Appeals Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Angelo Perotti
Claimant/appellant
Iliffe Booth Bennett and Others
Defendants/respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal; Summary Judgment at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant's allegations of professional negligence against his former solicitors and counsel had any real prospect of success
- 2 Whether the proceedings constituted an abuse of process by re-litigating issues already determined
- 3 Whether summary judgment was properly entered for the defendants
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant's allegations of negligence had no real prospect of success, the issues had already been determined in previous litigation, and the proceedings constituted an abuse of process. Summary judgment for the defendants was appropriate and permission to appeal was refused.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal dismissed
Orders
- Summary judgment for all defendants stands
- Proceedings struck out as an abuse of process
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment