London & Regional Investments Ltd v TBI Plc & Anor [2001] EWCA Civ 1026 (22 June 2001)
There are arguable grounds for appeal as the applicant's claims in equity and contract are not so unarguable as to justify summary judgment; the existence of factual disputes and potential for equitable relief warrant a trial.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 1026
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: London & Regional Investments Limited; Defendant/respondent: TBI PLC; Defendant/respondent: Belfast International Airport Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (renewed Oral Application)
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Joint Venture Agreements, Constructive Trust, Estoppel, Agreements to Agree
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
London & Regional Investments Limited
Claimant/applicant
TBI PLC
Defendant/respondent
Belfast International Airport Limited
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (renewed Oral Application)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Sale Agreement and Heads of Terms created a binding obligation for a joint venture
- 2 Whether equity should intervene to grant relief via constructive trust or estoppel
- 3 Whether summary judgment was appropriate given the factual disputes
Ratio Decidendi
There are arguable grounds for appeal as the applicant's claims in equity and contract are not so unarguable as to justify summary judgment; the existence of factual disputes and potential for equitable relief warrant a trial.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted
- Costs of the application to be costs in the appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment