Getronics Holdings Emea BV & Anor v Logistic & Transport Consulting Co & Ors [2004] EWHC 808 (QB) (24 March 2004)

Getronics Holdings Emea BV & Anor v Logistic & Transport Consulting Co & Ors [2004] EWHC 808 (QB) (24 March 2004)

Summary judgment was properly granted for those heads of claim where the claimants' evidence (documentary and computer records) established overpayments or payments for unperformed services and the defendants failed to raise a credible or substantiated defence. For certain heads of claim where the defendants produced some evidence or raised triable issues, summary judgment was refused and conditional or unconditional leave to defend was granted.

Citation
[2004] EWHC 808
Parties
Claimant/respondent: Getronics Holdings EMEA BV; Claimant/respondent: Getronics Holdings Belgium NV; Defendant/appellant: Logistic & Transport Consulting Co. (A Limited Partnership); Defendant/appellant: Logistic & Transport Ltd.; Defendant/appellant: Bright Cloud Corporation
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 March 2004
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Summary Judgment / High Court (queen's Bench Division) Appellate Review of Master's Summary Judgment Order
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; summary judgment upheld for some claims, conditional or unconditional leave to defend granted for others.
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Restitution for Money Had and Received, Burden of Proof in Summary Judgment, Documentary Evidence, Conditional and Unconditional Leave to Defend
Civil Procedure Contract Law Restitution Summary Judgment Restitution for Money Had and Received Burden of Proof in Summary Judgment Documentary Evidence Conditional and Unconditional Leave to Defend

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Getronics Holdings EMEA BV

Claimant/respondent

Getronics Holdings Belgium NV

Claimant/respondent

Logistic & Transport Consulting Co. (A Limited Partnership)

Defendant/appellant

Logistic & Transport Ltd.

Defendant/appellant

Bright Cloud Corporation

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Appeal Against Summary Judgment / High Court (queen's Bench Division) Appellate Review of Master's Summary Judgment Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether summary judgment was properly granted for claims in restitution for money had and received
  2. 2 Whether the evidential threshold for summary judgment was met for each head of claim
  3. 3 Whether the defendant had a real prospect of defending the claims or required further opportunity to do so

Ratio Decidendi

Summary judgment was properly granted for those heads of claim where the claimants' evidence (documentary and computer records) established overpayments or payments for unperformed services and the defendants failed to raise a credible or substantiated defence. For certain heads of claim where the defendants produced some evidence or raised triable issues, summary judgment was refused and conditional or unconditional leave to defend was granted.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; summary judgment upheld for some claims, conditional or unconditional leave to defend granted for others.

Orders

  • Summary judgment for claimants on French and German invoices, Italian invoices, inventory management (conditional on payment into court), Netherlands shuttle charge, European stock movements, Belgian stock movements, and PUDO standardisation claims as specified.
  • Unconditional leave to defend granted on excess picking claim.