Khatri v Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank BA [2010] EWCA Civ 397 (23 April 2010)
The claimant was entitled to a performance-related bonus under the March 2008 contract; there was no unequivocal acceptance of the July 2008 variation, and summary judgment was appropriate as no relevant factual dispute required a trial.
- Citation
- [2010] EWCA Civ 397
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Saleem Khatri; Defendant/respondent: Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank BA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; summary judgment granted to claimant.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Variation of Contract, Bonus Entitlement, Construction of Employment Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Saleem Khatri
Claimant/appellant
Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank BA
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was entitled to a performance-related bonus under the March 2008 contract
- 2 Whether the contract was validly varied by the July 2008 correspondence
- 3 Whether summary judgment should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant was entitled to a performance-related bonus under the March 2008 contract; there was no unequivocal acceptance of the July 2008 variation, and summary judgment was appropriate as no relevant factual dispute required a trial.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; summary judgment granted to claimant.
Orders
- Summary judgment for the claimant for the bonus entitlement under the March 2008 contract.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment