Hughmans (a firm) v Dunhill [2015] EWCA Civ 1307 (17 December 2015)
Permission to appeal is granted on multiple grounds because it is arguable that the judge erred in determining complex factual and legal issues summarily under CPR Part 24, particularly regarding the status of trust assets, the scope of the solicitor's duty, causation, and the viability of the children's claims.
- Citation
- [2015] EWCA Civ 1307
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Hughmans (a firm); Defendant/respondent: Dunhill
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Permission to Appeal From Summary Judgment
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted on specified grounds; permission refused on others.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Solicitor's Duty of Care, Trust Assets, Counterclaim, Causation, Scope of Retainer, Children's Claims, Wasted Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hughmans (a firm)
Claimant/appellant
Dunhill
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Permission to Appeal From Summary Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether summary judgment was appropriate under CPR Part 24
- 2 Whether Hughmans owed a duty of care to the defendant and her children
- 3 Whether there was a breach of duty by Hughmans
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal is granted on multiple grounds because it is arguable that the judge erred in determining complex factual and legal issues summarily under CPR Part 24, particularly regarding the status of trust assets, the scope of the solicitor's duty, causation, and the viability of the children's claims.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted on specified grounds; permission refused on others.
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted on grounds relating to summary judgment, scope of duty, breach, causation, and children's claims.
- Permission refused on ground relating to Professor Gazzard's evidence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment