Andric v Credit Suisse (UK) Ltd & Anor [2017] EWHC 1724 (Comm) (11 July 2017)
The claim, while weak and facing significant evidential challenges, cannot be said to have no real prospect of success without conducting a mini-trial. The evidence and supporting documents, though questionable, are not so improbable as to justify summary dismissal at this stage.
- Citation
- [2017] EWHC 1724 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr Milos Andric; First Defendant: Credit Suisse (UK) Limited; Second Defendant: Mr Hans-Olav Eldring
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Claim / Application for Strike Out or Summary Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Strike Out Applications, Contract Formation, Evidence, Loss and Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Milos Andric
Claimant
Credit Suisse (UK) Limited
First Defendant
Mr Hans-Olav Eldring
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Claim / Application for Strike Out or Summary Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim has a realistic prospect of success
- 2 Whether there was a binding agreement between Brova and BES
- 3 Whether a deposit of €8.25m was paid and forfeited
Ratio Decidendi
The claim, while weak and facing significant evidential challenges, cannot be said to have no real prospect of success without conducting a mini-trial. The evidence and supporting documents, though questionable, are not so improbable as to justify summary dismissal at this stage.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- CSUK's application for strike-out or summary judgment is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment