Cavendish Square Holding B.V. v Team Y&R Holdings Hong Kong Ltd [2018] EWHC 2755 (Comm) (26 October 2018)

Cavendish Square Holding B.V. v Team Y&R Holdings Hong Kong Ltd [2018] EWHC 2755 (Comm) (26 October 2018)

Summary judgment is inappropriate due to unresolved factual disputes regarding Mr Ghossoub's interest in competing businesses and whether those businesses were in competition with Menacom at the relevant time; these issues require investigation at trial.

Citation
[2018] EWHC 2755 (Comm)
Parties
Claimant/applicant: Cavendish Square Holding B.V.; Claimant/applicant: Team Y&R Holdings Hong Kong Limited; Defendant/respondent: Joseph Ghossoub
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 October 2018
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Summary Judgment Application / Summary Judgment Application, Pre Trial
Outcome
Application for summary judgment dismissed
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Restrictive Covenants, Shareholder Agreements, Breach of Contract, Penalties in Contracts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cavendish Square Holding B.V.

Claimant/applicant

Team Y&R Holdings Hong Kong Limited

Claimant/applicant

Joseph Ghossoub

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Commercial Court Summary Judgment Application / Summary Judgment Application, Pre Trial

  1. 1 Whether Mr Ghossoub was a Defaulting Shareholder under the SPA
  2. 2 Whether Mr Ghossoub breached clause 11.2 of the SPA
  3. 3 Whether summary judgment is appropriate given factual disputes

Ratio Decidendi

Summary judgment is inappropriate due to unresolved factual disputes regarding Mr Ghossoub's interest in competing businesses and whether those businesses were in competition with Menacom at the relevant time; these issues require investigation at trial.

Court Disposition

Application for summary judgment dismissed

Orders

  • Application for summary judgment dismissed; all issues to be determined at trial