TPD, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 16 (20 January 2026)

TPD, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 16 (20 January 2026)

The sentencing judge correctly assessed the seriousness of harm and culpability in breach of a TPIM notice, properly weighed aggravating and mitigating factors, and lawfully imposed a Serious Crime Prevention Order; the appeal was dismissed as no error of principle or law was found.

Citation
[2026] EWCA Crim 16
Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Appellant/defendant: TPD
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 January 2026
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence and Order
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
TPIM Notice Breach, Sentencing, Serious Crime Prevention Order, Mitigation, Culpability and Harm Assessment
Criminal Law Counter Terrorism TPIM Notice Breach Sentencing Serious Crime Prevention Order Mitigation Culpability and Harm Assessment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

TPD

Appellant/defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence and Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in assessing culpability and harm for breach of a TPIM notice
  2. 2 Whether sufficient weight was given to mitigation including mental health and reformation
  3. 3 Whether the imposition of a Serious Crime Prevention Order was necessary and proportionate

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge correctly assessed the seriousness of harm and culpability in breach of a TPIM notice, properly weighed aggravating and mitigating factors, and lawfully imposed a Serious Crime Prevention Order; the appeal was dismissed as no error of principle or law was found.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Leave to appeal granted
  • Appeal against sentence dismissed