Johnson v Luxcool Ltd & Ors

Johnson v Luxcool Ltd & Ors

The claimant failed to prove she had any tenancy of the premises or any part thereof, failed to establish damage to goods caused by the defendants, and failed to provide credible evidence of loss or quantum. All claims against the defendants fail.

Parties
Claimant: Julie Johnson; First Defendant: Luxcool Limited; Second Defendant: David Bineth; Third Defendant: Tariq Hussain
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 July 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Tenancy, Trespass, Damages, Quiet Enjoyment, Aggravated Damages, Exemplary Damages
Property Law Landlord and Tenant Tort Law Tenancy Trespass Damages Quiet Enjoyment Aggravated Damages +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Julie Johnson

Claimant

Luxcool Limited

First Defendant

David Bineth

Second Defendant

Tariq Hussain

Third Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant had a tenancy of any part of No. 87 or No. 89
  2. 2 Whether the claimant was wrongfully dispossessed
  3. 3 Whether damage was caused to claimant's goods or structures

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant failed to prove she had any tenancy of the premises or any part thereof, failed to establish damage to goods caused by the defendants, and failed to provide credible evidence of loss or quantum. All claims against the defendants fail.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed