Suurpere v Nice & Anor [2011] EWHC 2003 (QB) (27 July 2011)
The landlords failed to provide the prescribed information in the required form and did not comply with s.213(6)(a) by the date of the hearing; therefore, the tenant is entitled to a penalty of three times the deposit under s.214(4) Housing Act 2004.
- Citation
- [2011] EWHC 2003
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Karin Suurpere; Respondent/defendant: Christopher Nice; Respondent/defendant: Patricia Nice
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From County Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Tenancy Deposit Protection, Prescribed Information Requirements, Sanctions for Non Compliance, Assured Shorthold Tenancy, Housing Act 2004
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Karin Suurpere
Appellant/claimant
Christopher Nice
Respondent/defendant
Patricia Nice
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From County Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the landlords complied with the deposit protection scheme under s.213(6)(a) Housing Act 2004 and Article 2 of the Housing (Tenancy Deposits) (Prescribed Information) Order 2007
- 2 Whether the landlords provided the prescribed information to the tenant in the required form
- 3 Whether the tenant is entitled to a penalty under s.214(4) Housing Act 2004
Ratio Decidendi
The landlords failed to provide the prescribed information in the required form and did not comply with s.213(6)(a) by the date of the hearing; therefore, the tenant is entitled to a penalty of three times the deposit under s.214(4) Housing Act 2004.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order below set aside
- Respondents to pay the appellant £1,500 within 14 days
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment