Suurpere v Nice & Anor [2011] EWHC 2003 (QB) (27 July 2011)
The Respondents failed to comply with their statutory obligation to provide the prescribed information under s.213(6)(a) Housing Act 2004 by the date of the hearing. The tenancy had not been lawfully determined as at the hearing, so the Appellant was entitled to a penalty under s.214(4).
- Citation
- [2011] EWHC 2003 (QB)
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Karin Suurpere; Respondent/defendant: Christopher Nice; Respondent/defendant: Patricia Nice
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From County Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Tenancy Deposit Protection, Statutory Compliance, Sanctions for Non Compliance, Prescribed Information Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Karin Suurpere
Appellant/claimant
Christopher Nice
Respondent/defendant
Patricia Nice
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From County Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondents complied with the deposit protection scheme under s.213(6)(a) Housing Act 2004 and Article 2 of the Housing (Tenancy Deposits) (Prescribed Information) Order 2007
- 2 Whether the Appellant was entitled to a penalty under s.214(4) Housing Act 2004
Ratio Decidendi
The Respondents failed to comply with their statutory obligation to provide the prescribed information under s.213(6)(a) Housing Act 2004 by the date of the hearing. The tenancy had not been lawfully determined as at the hearing, so the Appellant was entitled to a penalty under s.214(4).
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order below set aside
- Respondents to pay Appellant £1,500 within 14 days
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment